To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
That’s a really great find. I did a few searches and did not find any updates. I was interested in seeing what the result of his efforts were. Anyways, the pictures there are great. He set the computer desk underneath the bed loft to save room.
As a longtime advocate of building smaller homes with fewer resources with an eye to living simply that others may simply live, I was a home designer/builder in CT, and am now a street minister in San Francisco’s Tenderloin district. Personally, I think Reid’s idea was wonderful, but then again, I live in 286 square feet and find it quite luxurious. Many of my colleagues who work with people who are without long term shelter thought Reid’s proposal was ridiculous, feeling that forcing people to live in such tiny spaces would be inhumane. I agree with that reasoning…it is terribly unfair that those of us with so much should expect those with fewer resources than we ourselves are willing to live with should have to live with drastically less. We social justice oriented tiny house advocates could serve by questioning the standards so many strive for, based in the notion that our worth is displayed through the amount of space and stuff that we surround ourselves ourselves with.
Your so right.materialistic things we show people all for a image.when life is so short .we shouldn’t be waisting life that way.To many things to see and experiences before were dead.T.V helped us along, way to fast..
Because of a disability, I live in a 3′ x 6′ area called my twin bed. I’m no longer in contact with most possessions. They’re extraneous…
It’s a sweet home, but continues to try to squeeze old interior concepts into a tiny space:
-Rather than a desk, try a clipboard.
-Replace all media with a computer.
-Store items beneath furniture. Vertical storage is claustrophobic.